Popular Posts
-
Rani Padmini In 1303 Allauddin khilji, Sultan of Delhi, intrigued by tales of the matchless beauty of Padmini, Rani of Chittor, of her wit a...
-
MOTTO- Sarvatra Sarvottam Surakhsha The National Security Guard (NSG):- is a Special Response Unit in India that has primarily been util...
-
1729 is the natural number following 1728 and preceding 1730. 1729 is known as the Hardy–Ramanujan number after a famous anecdote of th...
-
The best romantic ad i've ever seen before,,, there is no need to strip girls for a romantic scene, a romantic smile is even more enough...
-
Things to know about Anna Hazare and Lok Pal Bill 1.Who is Anna Hazare? An ex-army man. Fought 1965 Indo-Pak War 2.What's so special ab...
-
Mr. Rahul Gandhi do this work just for an hour....without media. Then tell us what you got... If you really want to Change our India....No n...
-
What I believe is, feminism has screwed up this generation especially women. Let me clear first, this feminism concept is raised only bec...
-
1. Since the Moon has only one light source, the Sun, the shadows must be in line. But in these cases, it looks as if there are multiple lig...
-
I've never let my schooling interfere with my education
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Did they land on moon
1. Since the Moon has only one light source, the Sun, the shadows must be in line. But in these cases, it looks as if there are multiple light sources in moon, which is not possible.
2. The foreground of many images of the astronauts on the Moon are filled in with light, while the shadows remain absolutely black, again proving that there are multiple light sources.
3. There are no stars in the background from pictures taken on the Moon.
4. In some images, a huge light source can be seen reflected in the astronaut's visors. This has to be a very bright, nearby source. There is no possibility of external light source in moon.
5. How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16, and 17 if there was no one on the lunar surface to man the camera?
6. There can't be any pictures taken on the Moon because the film would melt in the 250° temperatures. Any film exposed to 250° would indeed melt at that temperature.
7. The LM engine was very powerful. How come it did not leave a crater below the spacecraft? Why didn't it kick up any dust when it landed?
8. The footprints left by the astronauts are proof that the Moon landings are fake.
This one is also essentially a two pronged argument. First, the Fox show charged that the LM engine was so powerful that the upper layer of dust should have been blown away around the LM, so there should not be any footprints. Others have charged that the footprints should not be there since in the absence of water as a bonding agent, they should not maintain coherent shapes and sharp outlines.
9. There is no dust on LM footpads. -- According to Kaysing and Fox, this is the strongest evidence that the Moon landings are faked. They allege that with the swirling dust from LM descent engine, the foot pads should be covered with dust
10. The pictures below show that flags are waving. And they never will. The flag was on the airless Moon, just as we all knew.
11. SO IT MEANS THAT NEIL ARMSTRONG WAS NOT THE FIRST PERSON TO LAND ON MOON.
Monday, October 5, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)